Member-only story

Television and Controversial Humour: Exploring the Boundaries of Comedy

Elias Mitchell

·16.3k Followers· Follow

Published in Taboo Comedy: Television And Controversial Humour (Palgrave Studies In Comedy)

7 min read · 4 weeks before

538 View Claps

29 Respond

Save

Listen

Television has long been a breeding ground for controversial humour. From the slapstick antics of the Three Stooges to the political satire of Jon Stewart, humour has been used to challenge social norms, push boundaries, and provoke thought.

Taboo Comedy: Television and Controversial Humour (Palgrave Studies in Comedy)

by Grant Goddard

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	660 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	276 pages

In recent years, controversial humour has become increasingly common on television. This is due in part to the rise of social media, which has given comedians a new platform to share their work. It is also due to the changing landscape of television, which has become more diverse and inclusive, allowing for a wider range of voices to be heard.

While controversial humour can be a powerful tool for social change, it can also be a source of division and conflict. This is because humour is often subjective, and what one person finds funny, another person may find offensive. This can lead to disagreements, hurt feelings, and even violence.

It is important to remember that controversial humour is not always harmful. In fact, it can be a healthy way to explore difficult topics and challenge our own beliefs. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks associated with controversial humour, and to use it responsibly.

The History of Controversial Humour on Television

The history of controversial humour on television can be traced back to the early days of the medium. In the 1950s, comedians such as Lenny Bruce and Mort Sahl began to push the boundaries of what was considered acceptable humour. They used their platforms to challenge social norms, discuss taboo topics, and criticize the government.

In the 1960s and 1970s, controversial humour continued to flourish on television. Comedians such as George Carlin, Richard Pryor, and Bill Cosby used their humour to tackle issues such as race, religion, and politics. Their work was often controversial, but it also helped to change the way that we think about these issues.

In the 1980s and 1990s, controversial humour became more mainstream. Comedians such as Eddie Murphy, Chris Rock, and Dave Chappelle used their humour to challenge social norms and push boundaries. Their work was often funny, but it also sparked controversy and debate.

In the 21st century, controversial humour continues to be a staple of television programming. Comedians such as Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Trevor Noah use their humour to challenge the status quo and hold the powerful to account. Their work is often controversial, but it also helps to keep us informed and engaged in the world around us.

The Theory of Controversial Humour

There is no single theory of controversial humour. However, there are a number of different theories that attempt to explain why humour can be controversial.

One theory is that controversial humour is based on the incongruity theory of humour. This theory states that humour arises from the perception of incongruity, or a mismatch between what is expected and what actually happens.

Another theory is that controversial humour is based on the superiority theory of humour. This theory states that humour arises from the feeling of superiority that we experience when we see someone else make a mistake or do something foolish.

Finally, some theorists believe that controversial humour is based on the relief theory of humour. This theory states that humour arises from the release of pent-up emotions, such as anger or anxiety.

It is likely that all of these theories play a role in controversial humour. However, it is important to remember that humour is subjective, and what one person finds funny, another person may find offensive.

The Practice of Controversial Humour

The practice of controversial humour is a complex and challenging one. Comedians who use controversial humour must be careful not to offend or harm their audience. They must also be able to balance the need to be funny with the need to be respectful.

There are a number of different ways to use controversial humour effectively. One way is to use satire. Satire is a form of humour that uses exaggeration, irony, and ridicule to criticize a person, group, or institution.

Another way to use controversial humour effectively is to use irony. Irony is a form of humour that says one thing but means another. Irony can be used to make a point, to criticize someone, or to simply make people laugh.

Finally, comedians can use controversial humour to simply tell jokes. Jokes can be a great way to make people laugh, but they can also be used to challenge social norms and push boundaries.

The Ethics of Controversial Humour

The ethics of controversial humour are complex. Some people believe that controversial humour is harmful because it can offend, hurt, or even divide people.

Others believe that controversial humour is a valuable tool for social change. They argue that humour can be used to challenge social norms, push boundaries, and provoke thought.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to use controversial humour is a personal one. Comedians must weigh the potential benefits of using controversial humour against the potential risks.

If you are considering using controversial humour, it is important to be aware of the potential risks. You should also be prepared to defend your use of humour and to answer any questions or criticisms that you may receive.

Controversial humour is a complex and challenging form of comedy. It can be used to challenge social norms, push boundaries, and provoke thought. However, it can also be a source of division and conflict.

Taboo Comedy: Television and Controversial Humour (Palgrave Studies in Comedy)

by Grant Goddard

5 out of 5